Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom from WNY's avatar

While I respect your focus on wheelguns (I use them myself.), there is a parallel in the semi-auto world that saw a slightly better outcome. The 10mm Auto. Its making a comeback.

For LE use, the midbores (9mm) are better for general use; the balance between controllability, gun size and terminal performance is optimized.

Add another millimeter of bore diameter and raise MAP to 35-40K PSI and all 3 areas begin to have serious compromises. Ones hunters can deal with, but LEO agencies find challenging to manage.

The best workaround regarding largebores for an autopistol cartridge was introduced in 1905, the 45 ACP.

Don Curton's avatar

While I've never owned a .41 mag, the few people I know who have one love it.

In a similar concept, back when I owned several .44 magnums and shot them a lot, my handloads were all basically reduced power .44 special loads in a magnum case. Velocities around 1000 to 1100 fps were the magic zone where shooting was pleasant. So I guess in a sense, what handloaders did with the .41 I was already doing with the .44. And given that the .44 was actually a .429, I'm not sure there's any appreciable difference.

As for Bill Jordan's proposed ballistics, he basically just re-envisioned the 44-40 cartridge. He could have just had a new revolver rechambered in the 44-40 and called it a day.

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?